|
"Don't laugh!" I cautioned her. "You may be right."
"I am laughing, because I can take most of my clothes off when the sunshine is bright, and stand before you in a bikini if I want to, which you seem to find incredibly daring," said Indira. "Which imperial religion makes this appear daring to you? It's not Hinduism, is it? Of course the girls do the same in America, but they do it for a different reason. I do it from the recognition of myself as a human being facing another human being. On that platform there is nothing in sex that divides us. I can't be daringly dressed, or undressed, on this platform. This perception puts me miles ahead of the girls in America who wear their bikini for enticement. I am free. They are slaves to an ideology that isn't even their own. They think they are free, but they are toeing the line of the most ancient imperial game, the one that divides people right at their grassroots level. The Zionists are slaves to that too. They've become separated from their humanity as human beings. That's their assigned role to play, and they are playing it well. The role has been invented for them."
"Invented, isn't the right term," I interrupted Indira. "The role that they are playing in the world today has been assigned to them. The British caucus didn't invent Zionism with the Belford Declaration. They merely reassigned the role. The role had been created much earlier. It was almost forgotten. The Belford Declaration was merely an affirmation of a role that had been invented eons ago, and that has nothing to do with Judaism. The Belford Declaration defined the Jewish people as Zions, a people without a home, stranger in their own lands. The goal was to get them into Palestine as a battering ram against Islam. I heard it said that Hitler had offered the Jews money to leave Germany and resettle in Palestine. That was the imperial plan, the plan of Hitler's masters. The imperials had a role invented around that time for the Jewish people, the role of Zionism. Of course the process didn't work out as planned. Still, Indira, you are right. Zionism is ultimately an imperial creation. However, I think it stems from different empire of a different period. It appears to have started way before the era of the British Empire. It seems to have started in parallel with the Vedic Dark Age. And it appears to have started small. It appears to have started with the intentional perversion of everything the early Hebrew people held dear. It started with a political perversion of a religion that had promised to develop a highly humanist society. This budding religion had challenged the religious empire of the priesthood. It had to be perverted, and it was perverted."
"If you mean the doctrine that made the Israeli the chosen people, forget it, Peter," Indira interjected. "That's pure political hype. No religion supports that stuff, perverted or not."
"No, no, Indira. If you turn a humanist religion upside down you don't have a religion anymore. You end up with fascism, a sewer that includes everything that's inhuman. The doctrine of the chosen people came out of that, but it emerged far down the line. A humanist religion has the Principle of Universal Love as its foundation. The perversion of it has no principle. It's totally arbitrary. But this itself doesn't mean that you cant find the perversion written up in religious texts as if it were the word of God. Too many religious texts have been written by rulers in the pursuit of empires. The Brahmin wrote the Vedas from which they gained their power. The Hebrews did the same. A lot of scoundrels got into the act. The resulting Zionist ideology renders the Jewish people as God's "chosen people," which by implication renders the rest of mankind as worthless trash. That is how the State of Israel treats the people of the Middle East. Zionism was chosen by the British Empire for this qualification. Zionism is the doctrine of a "chosen people," of an imperial class with special privileges. We find the concept documented in the Bible as if it were a legitimate religion. Ah, but we don't find it showing up until we get to the fifth book of Moses, called Deuteronomy. The entire fifth book of Moses appears to lay out God's special regard for Israel. However, the book was created exclusively by the priests and for the priests own purpose, the purpose of gaining control over society. The book appears to be a document of a subtle religious imperial fraud. The perversion is so subtle that it flows into the religious background almost unnoticeable. The earlier concept that defined God as "the Holy One of Israel" is prominently reflected in the book of Isaiah where the phrase comes from. Then suddenly, in Deuteronomy, we find this relationship turned upside down. It is no longer God who is holy. We read instead that the Israelis have defined themselves as being holy to God as God's chosen people. Scholars have placed the book Deuteronomy into the 600 BC timeframe, roughly a hundred years after the time of Isaiah."
Next Page
|| - page index -
|| - chapter index -
|| - Exit -
||
|
